tv State of the Union CNN January 15, 2012 9:00am-10:00am PST
then you've got to tell them you're the fbi? you know where that guy was 30 seconds after hanging up? shimmying down his fire escape. >> banfield admits she needs a thicker skin and sounded a bit wounded. >> i was really in a rough way last night after my hero, jon stewart, my absolute hero. >> well, everyone in television needs a thicker skin. as for me, ashleigh, when i turn in, i'm taking my phone off the hook. that's if for this edition of "reliable sources." i'm howard kurtz. join us next sunday, 11:00 a.m. eastern for another critical look at the media. "state of the union" with candy crowley begins right now. >> south carolina is next. the firewall of the primary season, likely the last best chance for someone to slow mitt romney. today, rick perry on his outsider approach, sizing up the competition with obama campaign strategist david axelrod. >> we're going to have a big debate about our visions for the
future. >> romney supporter senator john mccain on the perils and promise of south carolina. plus, south carolina's powerful evangelical voting bloc. who will win the lion's share? with rev right hand brad adkins and bob jones iii. >> everything is up for grabs in my estimation. >> i'm candy crowley. and this is "state of the union." over 100 leaders in the social conservative community met in texas for two days and emerged with a single name, rick santorum for president. it is a blow to texas governor rick perry, a born-again christian whose political grounding is fiscal and social conservatism. tony perkins, head of the family research council and a major player at the meeting, says perry checks all the boxes except one, but he doesn't think he can win. >> what they wanted to do was make sure that the candidate that had the best chance of going forward of securing the nomination and winning the general election were the candidate they put their support behind.
>> governor rick perry joins me now from myrtle beach, south carolina, where you're telling me that the weather is great. so one thing that's going well for you. and i want to talk to you, though, about these social conservatives, the evangelicals, the christian conservatives meeting in texas and deciding that their consensus candidate is rick santorum. what's your reaction to that, governor? >> well, obviously, you'd like to get every endorsement of the groups that are in line with your beliefs, but you're not going to do that. so our focus is on the people of south carolina, and this morning we're going to be talking to a host of social conservatives. so we'll be reaching out directly to the south carolina voters and sharing with them our story. when you look at the record, i'm the most consistent both social and fiscal conservative in this race. if you're looking at just one part of that scenario, then you
may go with somebody else. but if you're looking for the full package of a job-creating, social conservative that's had 11 years of executive experience of running the 13th largest economy in the world, then south carolinans are going to be pretty happy with us. >> governor, they didn't actually disagree with you at that meeting in texas. in fact, tony perkins who i know i know, the family research council came out and told reporters on the phone and later he marks all the boxes in terms of social conservatism, fiscal conservatism, but they just don't think you can win. and that seems to me to be quite a blow. >> yeah. well, that's the same thing they said about ronald reagan in 1980. if you'll recall, they said he couldn't win. and he came down to south carolina and won that state because his values were more in line with the south carolina voters. you know, saturday the 21st
we'll know, and at that particular point in time, we'll find out who was right. >> what do you think the impact will be? do you expect it to have -- be a big boost for rick santorum's campaign or a big negative for mitt romney? how do you think this will affect south carolina? >> you know, again, we'll just have to see how it plays out. south carolina has pretty independent voters. there's a lot going back and forth. and you can't hardly turn on a tv here without seeing an ad that is attacking rick santorum for his fiscal policies. you know, it's going to be interesting with the economy like it is, and there are a lot of people who are social conservatives who realize they've got some choices in this race. but the economy this south carolina is suffering. they're almost at 10% unemployment. we were in georgetown yesterday where, you know, people are
still very sensitive to the issue of jobs lost and what's gone on in that town through the years. so i think there is a very deep focus on who is it that can get this country back on track from the standpoint of economics? and my record's pretty hard to argue with on that. >> you know, at some level, governor, this must have hurt, or did you just take it as oh, it's only business? >> i've been in this business long enough to understand that you're not going to get everybody to love you. and you're not going to get everybody to support you. >> these are your folks. i guess that's what i'm saying. these are your people. >> well, the issue is i understand how this process works. it's not organizations that elect. it's the people. and we're going directly to the people and sharing with them our story. again, if you're worried about getting your feelings hurt, you might not want to get in the
business of politics to start with. >> that's for sure. let me move you on to some of the campaigning you've been doing down there. in particular, talking about mitt romney and his association with bain capital and what it does. here's a little bit of what you've campaigned on. >> i will suggest they're just vultures. they're vultures that are sitting out there on the tree limb waiting for the company to get sick. and then they swoop in. they eat the carcass. they leave with that. and they leave the skeleton. >> governor, lots of things are said during primaries, as you know, that crop up again in the fall. should mitt romney become the republican nominee, are you comfortable with the fact that that quote is going to end up in an obama commercial? >> well, the issue is one about
who is best prepared to lead this country from the standpoint of job creation. and over the course of my tenure as governor of texas, we've helped create a climate where 1 million jobs have been created. we haven't been destructing businesses or destructing jobs with what we do is build jobs. >> sure. i'm talking about the rhetoric here. i mean, this is, you know, you've called him a vulture capitalist. and it's the kind of thing that you know president obama, who i know you want defeated, is going to use should mitt romney become the nominee. >> well, that issue's been out there for some time. as a matter of fact, stuart stevens who is a consultant used those exact words against meg whitman in california. this is not new terminology. and the fact is, if this is a fatal flaw, we need to be talking about it now, not talking about it in september and october. >> so you don't think that this
will -- would hurt mitt romney in the fall? >> well, we'll see here in south carolina. i think it will be -- the test is going to be in south carolina. georgetown, where we were yesterday, it is still a very sensitive issue that bain capital came in, and they basically shut down that steel mill and left with a substantial amount of money making management fees. and there were a lot of people out of work. so the issue is not going to go away. and it's not like we've cracked an egg open here for the first time. this was something that the obama team certainly knew about. and now's the time to talk about it, not september and october. >> governor perry, i'm going to ask you to stick with me. and when we come back, we'll ask governor perry about his campaign plans after south carolina. is this recently released web ad a clue? >> i never quit a day in pmy
life. i have never quit in the face of adversity. and i'm not to quit on the future of america. i am going to stay in this race. ♪ hands in position. airbags. ten of 'em. add blind spot monitor. 43 mpg, nice. dependability. yeah. activate dog. a bigger dog. ♪ [ male announcer ] introducing the reinvented 2012 camry. from toyota. ♪
we're back with texas governor and republican presidential candidate rick perry. i want to pick up on that web ad. first of all, was that a concession that your decision after what was a less-than-perfect showing in iowa to go back to texas and kind of think about whether you should stay in the race, is that web ad saying, i'm not going to quit? i'm not a quitter? is that a recognition that that was probably a mistake on your part to kind of signal that you were thinking about maybe you would get out of the race? >> well, there are a lot of folks in south carolina that certainly took the message that night that we were going to go back to texas and reassess. and the phones lit up. and it was an easy call for me. i went out the next morning, had
a run, and cleared my head. and it was kind of like, you know what? there are way too many people in south carolina. medal of honor recipient general jim livingston and former navy s.e.a.l. mike thornton who's also a medal of honor recipient and said, listen, the folks of south carolina, they want you to come. they want to have that former air force pilot and veteran and chief of your air forces and armies in texas to be in south carolina. so we have a real option. >> does that mean -- >> it made it pretty easy for me to say we're back in. >> okay. does that mean that no matter what, rain or shine, in south carolina, no matter how you do, you are in it for florida as well? >> that's our intention. >> so you would definitely go to florida even if you placed last? >> i -- that's our intention. >> okay. you brought up your military
background, which makes me want to just veer a little bit from politics and ask you a question about something that's in the news. the picture of these four marines urinating on the bodies of dead taliban members. if you were president perry, what would you do about that? >> well, obviously, 18, 19-year-old kids make stupid mistakes all too often. and that's what's occurred here. but, you know, when you're in war and history kind of backs up, there's a picture of general patton doing basically the same thing in the rhine river. and although there's not a picture, churchill did the same thing on the siegfried line. i'll tell you what's been -- >> that was -- you know, i have to tell you that -- >> -- really disturbing to me. >> go ahead. finish that thought. >> but what i'm saying what is really disturbing to me is just kind of the over-the-top
rhetoric from this administration and their disdain for the military, it appears. whether it's the secretary of state or whether it's the secretary of defense. these kids made a mistake. there's not any doubt it. should not have done it. it's bad. but to call it a criminal act i think is over the top. >> well, here's the problem, i think, all the things that you mentioned as part of history was before youtube, it was before the taliban, it was before this feeling that the u.s. somehow does not respect, you know, religions. this is something that's not just a picture. it's not just a message to americans. it's a message that could hurt us in the larger world. so i'm not sure of the exact age of them, but no matter what age they are, is this the kind of behavior that you think you can tolerate in the day and age when that picture is everywhere? >> well, here's the issue.
i will suggest to you that these are 18, 19, 20-year-old kids. they make mistakes. there is video out there of all types of things i will suggest to you. but the idea that this administration would go after these young people for a criminal act is, again, i think it is over the top. did they make a mistake? absolutely. should they be reprimanded and appropriately punished? yes. but going after them as a criminal act, i think really bad message. >> okay. thank you so much, governor rick perry. thank you for joining us. looking forward to seeing you in person in south carolina later this week. >> indeed. so long. after the break, the white house says they're not in campaign mode, but they've already honed in on one republican target. we'll tull you more after the break. copd makes it hard to breathe,
so i wasn't playing much of a role in my own life, but with advair, i'm breathing better so now i can take the lead on a science adventure. advair is clinically proven to help significantly improve lung function. unlike most copd medications, advair contains both an anti-inflammatory and a long-acting bronchodilator, working together to help improve your lung function all day. advair won't replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than twice a day. people with copd taking advair may have a higher chance of pneumonia. advair may increase your risk of osteoporosis and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition
or high blood pressure before taking advair. if you're still having difficulty breathing, take the lead. ask your doctor if including advair could help improve your lung function. get your first full prescription free and save on refills at advaircopd.com. like splenda® essentials™ no calorie sweeteners. this bowl of strawberries is loaded with vitamin c. and now, b vitamins to boot. coffee doesn't have fiber. unless you want it to. splenda® essentials™ are the first and only line of sweeteners with a small boost of fiber, or antioxidants, or b vitamins in every packet. mmm. same great taste with an added "way to go, me" feeling. splenda® essentials™. get more out of what you put in. the obama re-election team has been treating the republican
primary season like a formality. they think the president's november rival will be mitt romney, and they've been tuning up for months. in an e-mail blast this week, obama deputy campaign manager stephanie cutter branded romney a corporate raider, adding, "president obama -- who, like mitd romney, earned a degree from harvard and all the opportunities that affords -- began his career helping jobless workers in the shadows of a losed lose closed-down steel mill. romney, on the other hand, made millions closing down steel mills. shooting over the heads of his republican rivals straight at the president's record. >> we know that the future of this country is better than 8% or 9% unemployment. it's better than $15 trillion in debt. it's better than the misguided policies and prone promises of the last three years and the failed leadership of one man. the president has run out of ideas. now he's running out of excuses.
>> it is pretty heated for january. up next, the senior strategist on the obama re-election team, david axelrod. ♪ if you're like my patients, you want to hear you've done a good job caring for your mouth. that's why i recommend a rinse like crest pro-health multi-protection. it helps you get a better dental check-up. because not all rinses provide all these benefits. so be ready for your next dental check-up. crest pro-health multi-protection rinse. [ male announcer ] try any crest pro-health rinse.
david axelrod, senior strategist for the obama re-election campaign. i'm tempted to ask you if they dragged you back from chicago. >> no, washington is a great place to visit. chicago is a wonderful place to live. >> gotcha. let me bring you some very washington thing, and that is poll numbers. the latest cnn/orc poll, the question was, who can best get the economy moving? who can get the economy moving? under obama, 40%. romney, 53%. you obviously think there's a disconnect here. where is it? >> well, i think that's what campaigns are for. and we're going to have a big debate about our visions for the future. you know, governor romney told some voter was sharing her economic concerns with him about her own life the other day. and he gave her a whole treatise on the economy and finished by saying, you know, productivity equals income. well, he misses the central issue of our time. americans am s around -- it's n
that they aren't working hard enough. they're worker harder than ever. and for the decade, their income has been flat really for several decades, and it's dropped in the last decade. that is the central issue of our time. how do we create an economy in which the middle class is growing, wages are growing, standards of living are not declining but growing. that's what a successful economy looks like. he misses that point. and we're going to have a big debate about how we achieve that kind of economy. it's not just about folks at the top doing well. it's about everybody having the opportunity to get ahead. >> but couldn't that huge gap, which is a pretty big gap between those who think he could handle the economy as opposed to mitt romney, couldn't it also be that from the day-- from the month the president took office, we still have 1.7 million fewer jobs in the marketplace? >> candy, i'm happy to have that discussion. do you know that when he was campaigning for president in 2007 and 2008, governor romney had nothing but praise for the economic policies that were in
place at that time, as america was sliding into the worst recession since the great depression after eight years in which -- >> but this is a fact. >> -- after which we squandered $2 trillion surplus. the worst month that we've had of job loss was the month that this president took office from the last administration. and since that time, we've created 3 million private sector jobs. if you look at the chart, the chart's going like this. we've had 22 straight months of private sector job growth. now, we need to accelerate that. but the fact is, governor romney praised the policies that got us into this mess. he wants to go back to those policies. and he assigns everything that's gone wrong in our economy to the president. and he says everything that's gone right has nothing to do with him. >> let me talk a bit about bain capital where mitt romney, you know, ran the company. >> i've heard that. >> it has been quite the raised subject on the campaign trail. and one of the things that you all have said and tried to
reiterate with some of his republican rivals are saying is, listen. this guy is a big corporate raider. he went in. he, you know, closed up companies, lost all of these jobs. he was asked about this recently on cbs. and i want to play for our audience something he said. >> in the general election, i'll be pointing out that the president took the reins of general motors and chrysler, closed factories, closed dealerships, laid off thousands and thousands of workers. he did it to try and save the business. we also had, on occasion, to do things that are tough to try and save a business. >> you've got to do things that are tough to try to save a business. does he have a point? >> let me point out that there are 150,000 more people working in the auto industry today. >> they are but they did lay off peop people. >> if we had followed governor romney's prescription, which he famously wrote an op-ed saying detroit would go bankrupt, we would have lost 1.4 million jobs. the reason his work at bain is an issue is because governor
romney has offered his business experience as his sole credential really for being president of the united states. so it behooves everybody to look at what that experience is. the truth is that he closed 1,000 or more factories, stores and offices. he outsourced tens of thousands of jobs. just a second. he took 12 companies to bankruptcy on which he and his partners made hundreds of millions of dollars. >> but the point here is, i think, that doesn't he have a point by showing, look, the president had to say to gm, for instance, they had to lose some of these jobs. they closed up dealerships. so in order to make the company healthy and able to move on to then create more jobs, had he to cut jobs. >> first of all, the bankruptcies that i cited, the 12 bankruptcies were ones in which he participated, in which he and his partners made hundreds of millions of dollars, he is the one who is claiming job gains for companies -- from companies after he and his --
and bain got out of them, years after he and bain got out of them. i'm just assigning to him the things that he personally was -- >> you're talking he was there at the moment. >> -- that he was responsible for. and closing, you know, saving an industry as the president did is different than strip mining companies in order to profit off of them, which is, in many cases, what mr. romney did. again, he's entitled to do that. that was his business practice. he's entitled to do that. nobody is begrudging that. the question is, is that the philosophy want in the white house? is that the economic vision for this country, outsourcing, offshoring, stripping down companies, lowering wages, lowering benefits? i don't think that's the future for this country. >> again, let me set that aside and try to get you in this final minute i have with you. to frame up for me several possibilities. in a sentence. what would a race be about obama
versus romney? la what is the core of that race? >> it's about not just how we rebuild our economy, but we embrace those values that will build an economy which the middle class is growing and people can work hard and get ahead in this country again. >> obama/gingrich. >> well, i think it's largely going to be the same. i think the central issue of our time is how we create an economy in which the middle class is growing once again, in which people who can believe that if they work hard, they get ahead. if they're responsible, they'll be rewarded. if people aren't responsibility, there are institutions that will be held accountable. that's what people are looking for. that's where our future should lie. >> somebody in your campaign told me not that long ago when i said what do you most worry about in terms of campaign strategy, is it romney? is it gingrich? he said no, it's the economy. is that still true in >> external factors, what happens in europe and other places in the world.
and frankly the other thing that worries are these big super pacs. i think there's going to be a ton of money aimed at the president. >> democratic ones, too. >> but not nearly the scale we're seeing on the republican side. they're talking upwards of $500 million in interest groups who don't disclose and who can raise unlimited amounts of money. that is a very, very concerning thing to me. >> david axelrod, thank you for visiting washington. we appreciate it. thanks. beth!
hi. looking good! you've lost some weight. thanks! you noticed! you know these clothes are too big now, so i'm donating them. not going back there again. good for you! how'd you do it? eating right, whole grain. whole grain? whole grain. [ female announcer ] people who choose more whole grain tend to weigh less than those who don't... multigrain cheerios has five whole grains and 110 lightly sweetened calories per serving... more grains. less you! multigrain cheerios.
joining me here in washington, former republican presidential nominee and current romney supporter, senator john mccain. senator, thank you for joining us. >> thank you, candy. >> the hot political topic is this big meeting in texas where romney wasn't apparently even part of the conversation. you're a guy that didn't even consider endorsing. how big of a hit is that for him? >> well, i this i it nk it is a. let's be honest. there is a very strong evangelical movement in south carolina. but at the same time, there is
a, in south carolina, very dire economic situation. unemployment is nearly 10%, and that certainly is a much higher priority for the voters than it would be if the unemployment rates were down. and also, i think it's a little late as well. but it's bound to have some effect. but i don't know -- i don't think it's going to be real significant. >> i want to take you on a little trip down memory lane. >> thanks. >> i know you're going to appreciate this. in 2000, you had your own tug and pull with this community and had this to say. february 28th, you were in virginia beach. >> neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer reaches of american politics and the agents of intolerance, whether they be louis farrakhan or al sharpton on the left or pat robertson or jerry falwell on the right. >> so do you think at this point that members of the republican party who are running for president still have to pander to the right?
>> i don't think they have to pander, but i think the more inclusive that our party is, the better off we are. it's clearly jobs and the economy are the transcendent issues of this campaign. in 2008, national security played a much higher role because, obviously, the economy was good up until nearly the very end. so we want to be as inclusive as possible, but we don't want one segment of our base to dominate because clearly the -- we are the party of abraham lincoln and theodore roosevelt and ronald reagan. >> but it's possible they could change the mix in south carolina with this, is it not? >> again, i think it's going to have some effect. but a lot of voters have already made up their mind. either rightly or wrongly. every poll shows that they believe that mitt romney is the most electable. and also, the economy is the dominating issue. >> and you obviously think that favors your candidate with his
business background. >> he has the experience. he has the background. i think he has the platform and agen agenda. it's very clear to me that audiences are reacting positively to his message. and, again, he does have -- it's under attack now -- he does have experience in job creation. >> i want to talk to you in a minute about bain capital, but i want to wrap up the evangelical issue first. and that is that tony perkins who was a major mover and shaker in this meeting. he's head of the family research council, as you know. he said that this group of conservatives would give strong support to santorum, gingrich or perry if they got the nomination. your guy's missing from that formulation. do you think if mitt romney is nominated by the republican party, if he gets enough delegates, that evangelicals, conservative christians, will sit on their hands? >> i don't think so. by the way, i worked with tony
perkins and some of those people on other issues. i'm convinced that we will come together. and there's no doubt in my mind. and, again, i understand the viewpoint and the priorities of the evangelical christians. but i also understand that the economy, electability and the fact that senator santorum and newt gingrich were pork barrelers and earmarkers which is, in the words of tom coburn, my colleague from oklahoma, the gateway drug to corruption. we had corruption as a result of earmarking. and that's just a matter of record. also, as we know, senator santorum was rejected for re-election by the people of pennsylvania by nearly 18 points. >> let me move you on to what we talked about, bain capital, the company that was founded by mitt romney. and i want to take you back again. i'm sure this will surprise you.
this is 2008. you and mitt romney were, among others, were in a battle in the primary season. >> as the head of his investment, quote, company, he presided over the acquisition of companies that immediately laid off thousands of workers. >> i get it. you know. things like this happen in campaigns. but the fact of the matter is -- >> right after the campaign was over, nobody worked harder for my campaign than mitt romney. we spent time together. i got to appreciate and have a friendship with him. and these primaries are tough. i understand that. >> they are, but the fact is that that's how you looked at bain then, and that's how his opponents said, look, this was a group, nothing illegal, that went in and in trying to make a company profitable, trying to make money for their investors and themselves basically stripped companies. >> yeah. and at that time when i said that, mitt romney responded, and i think very strongly, about the thousands of jobs by staples and other companies and corporations
that did very well. it was a legitimate debate point. but the fact is that over time, mitt romney has been involved in job creation and a governor and a very effective governor of a very liberal state. >> has he made an effective argument for bain at this point? >> i believe so because i think there's some holes in the story here. this movie that found a couple of people that said it was distorted. i think you're going to see people come forward who, for example, started that in a warehouse, $5 million, staples. not a half a billion dollars salinder provided for the taxpayers and government. that's the contrast. clearly the president believes that government creates jobs. and that's much to the great loss of taxpayer dollars. >> let me ask you two questions that aregential to this point in the campaign. i was interested to hear
governor perry say that he thinks the administration has been over the top in its response to these pictures of these marines urinating on the bodies of dead taliban. he compared it to some things that patton did, urinating in a river along with churchill. and what he objects to, he said that they call it had a criminal act. certainly they're looking into whether there are any criminal charges here. do you object to that? do you think governor perry's right? >> no, i don't. well, first of all, i don't obtain to the marine corps looking into this. it's a breakdown in discipline is ha it is. is what it is. it's very tough, these conditions. nobody can explain how tough it is, combat, unless they've been in it. but the marine corps prides itself on its discipline. they pride themselves that we don't level ourselves to the enemy. it makes me sad more than anything else because these are the great -- the finest -- i can't tell you how wonderful these people are, and it hurts
their reputation and their image. >> you have no problem with the way the administration has handled it so far. >> no, i think a full and complete investigation is entirely appropriate. i did read an article by somebody this morning that said maybe young marines have difficulty understanding why we would waterboard somebody while they're alive. and then it would not be okay to do what they did after they're dead. >> well, sure. you go out and kill people, but then you respect the body. there's a certain dynamic there that doesn't seem to make sense. >> you have to respect the body. and we're trying to win the hearts and minds. and when something else like that comes up, it obviously harms that ability. the thing that's the saddest of all that 999 out of 1,000 of these young people are the very best who want to win this conflict and don't want to do anything that would harm our ability to do so. >> and finally, i have half a minute left here. what does ron paul want? >> i think ron paul wants to have a significant role to play in the republican party. he is getting -- you know, he's
at least up till now got about 20% of the vote. there's room for ron paul in our party. and we welcome him. and we'll continue the debate with him. >> senator john mccain, safe travels. >> thank you. >> you are off and about. >> thank you. >> thank you. when we come back, mannequins, motorcycles and the grateful dead. the lighter side of the campaign trail. this is an rc robotic claw. my high school science teacher made me what i am today. our science teacher helped us build it. ♪ now i'm a geologist at chevron, and i get to help science teachers. it has four servo motors and a wireless microcontroller.
over the last three years we've put nearly 100 million dollars into american education. that's thousands of kids learning to love science. ♪ isn't that cool? and that's pretty cool. ♪ isn't that cool? and that's pretty cool. ♪ more and more folks are trying out snapshot from progressive. a totally different way to save on car insurance. the better you drive, the more you can save. no wonder snapshot's catching on. plug into the savings you deserve with snapshot from progressive.
on this week's installment of the campaign trail, we want to walk the lighter side. random moments, cornball comments that defy explanation. they make for analysts entertainment and serve as reminders that politicians are people, too. did you hear the one about the candidate who is running late for a campaign event? >> there's a lot of traffic out here. i'm pretty pleased that so many folks have come to meet with us. we're just making the turn right now onto folly road. and as soon as we do, we'll be there pretty quick. >> i'm doing a science project
on germs. how many hands do you shake every day, and how often do you wash your hands? >> ha! did my wife put you up to that? where is it? do you have it? purell. >> i want to be the president who embarks on a grateful deadlike concert tour around this country. and it's the passion of the american people in getting it done. >> i wish i could ride one of these. my son had a motorcycle which i would ride on occasion, rarely. >> can you get on one? >> no. put on a helmet maybe, dukakis style. >> i thought this lady had her hand up over here. just kidding you. she does. best question i'll get, right? >> ten months of campaign moments to go. up next, two evangelical leaders in south carolina tell us their criteria for picking a candidate. stick with us. giant frozen vegetables.gren
prior to saturday's consensus in texas, i spoke to bob jones, chancellor of bob jones university, and brad adkins, president of the south carolina baptist convention. they asked hem to tell me what they were hearing from the evangelical community. >> well, i'm hearing everything across the boards. i don't think this thing has been anywhere close to being nailed down yet. and probably not until the voter actually goes into the booth and casts his vote. everything is up for grabs in my estimation. >> and reverend adkins, would you sort of agree with that assessment? >> well, i don't think they're all over the place, but it really is much too early to concede victory to any candidate right now. >> less than a week away. >> an opportunity to look at six men, and time is fleeting. so the time is ticking away that people will ultimately have to make that decision. >> is there any effort within south carolina to try to unify the evangelical vote, the conservative christian vote? >> well, what i'm trying to do
to help unify the vote, if you look at god's word, he makes it clear that he's not the author of confusion. and he says in his word that if we will humble ourselves and pray, that he will give us wisdom. so the south carolina voters will have to do their homework and pray for wisdom to narrow the field down to ultimately next saturday who that one person will be who will get that vote. >> mr. jones, in 2008, you endorsed mitt romney. why have you not endorsed him again this time around? >> well, in 2008, he was very solicitous of the evangelical vote. if he is that today, i am unaware of it. i certainly have had no contact with him. and so i don't know whether he feels he needs it or wants it, whether he considers it a plus or a minus for him. that was a different dynamic then. the other players in the
republican primary frightened me greatly in 2008. and people were saying, you know, mitt romney has the credentials from his business experience and so forth, but he's a mormon. and can we really vote for a mormon? and many of them said i like him, but i just don't know whether we as christians should vote for a mormon. and i felt like he stood the best chance of defeating hillary who was the chief contender at that hour on the democratic side. and so i just had to speak out and say, you know, we're trying to elect a president, not a preacher. and if this man can best run our country and can beat hillary clinton, then why should we be afraid of him even though we vitally disagree with his mormonism? mormonism is not christianity. and he understood that. and he never tried to make a blend between mormonism and christianity. and i respected the fact that he didn't try to present himself or mormonism as christianity.
>> so if i understand you correctly, you have not chosen -- you have chosen not to support him or endorse him at least this time around because he has not actively wooed the evangelical community. >> well, you know, if he has, i'm unaware of it. he certainly has not made any overtures to us. so if he is doing it, i'm unaware of it. i just feel like those who want it should ask for it. not that they're going to get it. but, you know, if they feel it's important, then why don't they say so? >> let me ask you, mr. at kikin you have written that for evangelic evangelicals, mitt romney's mormonism will be more of a problem than newt gingrich's admitted infidelities, his three marriages. so what you're telling me is that someone who's been married for more than 40 years, has 5
children so far as we know, in terms of values, if not religion, has certainly had social values is less acceptable to you because of his religion than someone who has strayed along the way. >> it's not a simple process for a voter to just merely go to the voting station and say, i'm voting for this person because they line up with me doctrinally about what i believe, about who god is, who jesus christ is today and was in accordance to what the bible teaches us and how that impacts their very lives. the issue has never been with romney's morality. granted, he is a very moral man, a very good father, good husband, has done a lot of good things in his life. >> reverend atkins and mr. jones, i want to ask you one final question starting with reverend atkins. do you believe in this election on saturday in this primary that social issues will trump the economy? >> i have people in my church that three years ago, they were
very secure with the economy. they were secure with their jobs. since thattime they've lost their jobs. they're now doing jobs that are much less in pay than what they were doing before. so all of these things are going to weigh in the process of who they wind up casting that vote for. >> and mr. jones, when you go in to vote for whoever you will vote for, what will be uppermost in your mind, the social values of that candidate? the christian tradition of that candidate? or the high unemployment rate and the bad economy in south carolina? >> i'm going to be considering who is best qualified to beat president obama in the general election. we have not primarily lost our way economically. we have primarily lost our way to find god. america has walked out on god almighty. and america's problems economically and otherwise stem from the fact that i believe the
lord is very displeased with this nation because we have turned our back on him and snubbed him. and we treat him like he doesn't exist. he doesn't matter to most people. >> job jones iii, thank you so much for being with us. reverend brad atdkins, to you a well. up next, hue lights from the other sunday morning talk shows. and then "fareed zakaria gps" at the top of the hour. so ? university of phoenix made it doable. a lot of my instructors were principals in my district. i wouldn't be where i am without that degree. my name is dr. carrie buck. i helped turn an at-risk school into an award winning school, and i am a phoenix. [ male announcer ] find your program at phoenix.edu.
i'm going to own my own restaurant. i want to be a volunteer firefighter. when i grow up, i want to write a novel. i want to go on a road trip. when i grow up, i'm going to go there. i want to fix up old houses. [ female announcer ] at aarp we believe you're never done growing. i want to fall in love again. [ female announcer ] discover what's next in your life. get this free travel bag when you join at aarp.org/jointoday. ♪ tell me what you really mean ♪ do you know what you want? ♪ while beating up on yesterday ♪ ♪ rolling on, moving on [ female announcer ] the space of a small suv. and more ways to connect to your world. ♪ do you know what you are? the all-new prius v from toyota.
time for today's "sound of sunday." former speaker newt gingrich who long ago predicted he would win the nomination is confining himself now to the short term. saturday's south carolina primary. >> i think we're going to win here. and i think we are increasingly consolidating, and i'm very excited by the next seven days. and we have a lot of stuff planned all over the state. and i think it's going to be a very, very exciting campaign. >> just the teensiest window for the alternative, he added he'll have to reassess his campaign if he doesn't win south carolina. saturday christian evangelical leaders in texas voted to back santorum for the republican nomination. sunday he was busy talking up his credentials. >> someone willing to stand up for all the issues, the economic
issues and the moral crisis of this debt and this explosion of government and willing to stand up against radical jihadism. and the things that are important to conservatives across this country. >> santorum's poll numbers have been underwhelming of late, but the evangelical endorsement ahead of a primary where conservative christians are dominant seemed to give him a shot of confidence. >> we feel like once this field narrows and we get it down to two people, we have an excellent opportunity to win this race. and in what is clearly a recognition that come november, republicans will need the voters ron paul is attracting in january, tea party republican and south carolina governor jim demint is urging the party to diversify. >> the republican party needs to embrace not only the tea party which includes, i think, a wide cross-section of americans, but a lot of the libertarian thoughts that we're hearing from ron paul. what i hope is that our eventual nominee will recognize the